Iran Opposes Ceasefire, Outlines 10-Point Plan for Lasting Peace

Mintesinot Nigussie

Iran rejected a U.S. proposal for an immediate ceasefire on Monday and presented a 10-point framework for a permanent resolution to the conflict with the United States and Israel. The plan, delivered through Pakistani mediation, calls for the end of regional hostilities, safe passage through the Strait of Hormuz, lifting of sanctions, and reconstruction.

The Pakistani-brokered proposal had suggested an immediate ceasefire followed by broader peace talks expected to conclude within 15 to 20 days. Tehran’s response indicates its insistence on a long-term settlement rather than a temporary halt to hostilities.

U.S. President Donald Trump rejected the Iranian plan and reiterated his Tuesday night deadline for an agreement. At a news conference, he warned that Iran could be “taken out” in a single night if it failed to comply, threatening to destroy bridges and power plants.

Iran’s top joint military command described Trump as “delusional” and denounced his remarks as “rude, arrogant rhetoric and baseless threats.” Iran’s deputy sports minister called on citizens to form human chains at power plants nationwide to protest any attacks on public infrastructure.

Iran’s envoy to the United Nations condemned Trump’s social media post as “direct incitement to terrorism” and evidence of intent to commit war crimes under international law. Independent experts have warned that strikes on civilian infrastructure would constitute war crimes.

In addition to the dispute over Hormuz, Iran threatened retaliation following a U.S.-Israeli strike early Monday on Sharif University of Technology in Tehran.

The developments have heightened tensions and raised concerns over the potential for further escalation in the region. Businesses in energy, shipping and insurance sectors are closely monitoring the situation for any impact on global trade routes.

The Iranian 10-point plan represents a firm position that any resolution must address long-term issues rather than provide only a temporary pause in hostilities.

Overall, the exchange of proposals and threats underscores the complexity of reaching a lasting agreement amid the ongoing conflict.